Friday, May 8, 2009

Dire Straits of the East Asia Slave Trade

By Matt Weafer

VENT Magazine
 

David says he's 10 years old.

His caretakers say he's probably only seven or eight.

No one knows for certain.

David is an orphan in East Asia, and Pastor Brian Gibson of River City Church and a few members of his congregation took a missionary trip to the orphanage in February. While they were there, they took some of the kids to a carnival.

David laughed, played and ate cotton candy like any young boy.

But just six days before that, he was a house slave in Burma, probably sold by his family for around $20 with the hope that he would have a better life than his parents.

His story is a common one among children in East Asia; the difference is that David was rescued. Most of these children remain house slaves, sex slaves or prostitutes for the rest of their lives, which are usually cut short from AIDs, malnutrition or murder.

Gibson, his wife Jessica Gibson, Bill Mayfield and Ryan Staples spent 10 days in Thailand with Lana, the founder of Life Impact International. For Lana's safety, we cannot publish her last name. Corruption runs rampant in the area and rescuing children from slavery makes Lana an enemy to the slave trade. "Their butts are on the line," Gibson said.

Gibson and his crew's mission was to learn more about the tragedies of the area—genocide, severe poverty, slavery, and other destitution—and to film a documentary for Life Impact.

Around 900,000 to one million people are sold into slavery a year, Gibson said. "The sex traffic industry—illegal slave trade—it makes more money than any corporation you can think of in a year."

And while slaves are captured or purchased from all over the globe, a majority of them are children sold by desperate parents hoping they will not only provide their children a better future but also to have one less mouth to worry about feeding each day.

In the documentary, Lana said that most of these parents don't know that they are condemning their children to a lifetime of torture and degradation. Slave traders tell parents that the children will sell flowers, go to school and learn a trade.

They do sell flowers initially as the first phase of breaking the child's spirit. In the second phase, the slave traders, molest, beat and starve the children—just like taming a wild horse—to remove their desire for freedom, their ability to question authority, and their hope for a decent life, transforming them into complacent robots obeying instructions until set free, usually by death.

The four missionaries spent their time getting to know the rescued children and touring the area to see how Americans—Owensboroans, specifically—can help.

Little David was still acclimating himself to a life outside of forced labor and destitution. David suffered from malnutrition; his stomach had swollen and he had to visit the hospital every three days for blood transfusions. However, his owners forced him to walk the two miles there and back.

While Gibson and his crew spent time with David, they took him to a restaurant.

"This was the first restaurant he'd ever been to," Gibson said. "We took him to a nice restaurant, which was something else for him. He thought we were kings."

While at the restaurant, Gibson took him to the restroom. "He goes to the bathroom and tries to wash his hands in the urinal," he said.

Staples said, "They have fish ponds in the restaurant and he's reaching in trying to catch fish. Then he's gone for a minute and he comes back with a lizard."

"The girls are like look he's got a lizard as a pet," Gibson said. "And I'm like I don' think that's a pet. He's got a rock and he's going to cut its belly open and eat it. He's a scrapper. He's learned to take care of himself."

Not all of the children were that lucky. Gibson said when they walked through the red light district, they were approached by pimps pointing to prostitutes standing emotionless in windows and doorways. "There were signs listing prices for different sex acts and types of prostitutes," he said.

"The average age of a prostitute is 14," Gibson said, "and they'll have to sleep with up to 20 people a day. Stats are one in 10 people in Thailand are HIV positive. So, you're sold as a slave, and you have to sleep with 20 people a day when you're a young teenager. It's a death sentence. You're going to die of AIDs."

A popular myth in Asia and Africa, he said, is that sleeping with virgins will cure you of AIDs.

Once a prostitute becomes too sick, pimps will send them to border villages to die.

"The people are so uneducated," Gibson said, "packs of kids will come by and rape them, and then those kids get AIDs."

"Lots of Chinese businessmen come to Thailand," he said. "They hold a belief that the younger a child you sleep with, the more blessing it brings on your business. There are even doctors in Bangkok that will take a one or two-year-old baby and perform surgery on it to make it possible for a male to have intercourse."

A number of variables combined to create this horrifying environment, including government corruption, genocide, poverty and greed.

The influx of Burmese refugees into the area has drastically affected the number of impoverished families in the area. And local residents discriminate against the culture of the Burmese people, known as the Karen.

Nearly 50,000 registered Burmese refugees live on a four-square-mile refugee camp along with at least 30,000 unregistered refugees. Gibson said Burmese dictators have terrorized the Karen by pillaging villages, kidnapping children, raping women and forcing young boys into the military. The government and drug dealers also sell Yabba, a version of crank, at half price to the Karen to help destroy their culture.

"These Burmese people are all over Thailand and they see them as a problem," Gibson said. "So the Thai people exploit them: sell kids to the sex trade; hire them, work them for three months, and not want to pay them, so they kill them, put them in the river. And nobody cares. It's just another dead Karen."

Tens of thousands of impoverished families struggle to find food each day and the culture and local government support—or at least don't attempt to impede in the—exploitation of the lowest class in East Asia.

The Life Impact Web site, www.lifeimpactintl.org, says, "In India, a buffalo costs $350 . . . and a child costs $12." The Web site also says more than 165 million children between five and 14 are involved in some kind of forced labor.

Lana and Life Impact are working to rescue children, educate parents and help families work toward a sustainable living.

River City Church will be sending another group of missionaries to the region soon to teach trades and help educate workers in the orphanage on how to properly care for young children.

One of the best ways for Owensboro residents to offer assistance is through donations. Visit www.lifeimpactintl.org.

A Web-friendly version of the documentary composed by Staples will be available on Life Impact's Web site. River City Church will also host another viewing of the full documentary in the future.

"We live in the safest place on Earth, and so many of us don't even know it," Gibson said. "We don't realize how much we can really accomplish."

"I got back and just realized how many of my friends just hang out at Starbucks," Staples said. "There's so much more you can do, so much more rewarding than being insular."

One of the most noticeable things that Staples noticed upon his return was "how ethnocentric a group of people we are in this region—really in America—how insular we are and not in a horrible neglectful kind of way. It's just people don't think about the other side of the world. You hear about it but it seems like trendy causes. Let's wear a wrist band or listen to Bono talk about AIDs, but no one really thinks about it until you go see it."

"It's not that they're bad people," Gibson said. "It's just that they've never seen it."

Gibson and Staples both said their most memorable experiences of the trip were with David, who is now healthy and happy along with more than 50 other children Life Impact has rescued.


 


 

Lighter Living: Fragrances are evil

By Matt Weafer

VENT Magazine
 

Sure they smell nice sometimes. But they are one of the most common carcinogens exposed to humans on a daily basis.

"Fragrances" refers to the ingredient listed in thousands of non-perishable cleaning and hygienic products on the market.

Manufacturers use fragrances in laundry detergents, window cleaners, oven cleaners, furniture polishes, lotions, shampoos, conditioners, body soaps, and deodorants and, of course, in its most concentrated forms, perfumes, colognes, body sprays, scented candles and air fresheners.

Ingredients commonly found in manufactured fragrances have been linked to cancer and asthma and pose serious risks to young children and unborn babies.

In 2007, the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) tested household air fresheners and found phthalates in more than a dozen brands out of 14, including some marked "unscented" or "all-natural." Phthalates damage the reproductive system and interrupt normal development by mimicking the body's hormones.

The two products that contained no phthalates were Febreeze Air Effects and Renuzit Subtle Effects.

In 2005, Greenpeace funded a study of 36 random perfumes and colognes, which concluded that all of the fragrances contained significant amounts of known hazardous chemicals, including synthetic musks and phthalates.

The California Air Resources Board released a 2006 study of household cleaners and air fresheners; the report found chemicals classified by the Environmental Protection Agency as hazardous air pollutants in the products.

The University of Washington in Seattle determined that six popular brands of air fresheners contained nearly 100 Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) that were not listed on the ingredients lists; ten of the VOCs are regulated as toxic or hazardous under federal laws.

Fragrances are difficult to regulate because of the variety of products on the market and because ingredients in fragrances are protected as trade secrets, so manufacturers do not have to list ingredients.

The EPA reports, "No single federal agency has jurisdiction over all products that have a fragrance or the different types of fragrances (chemical mixtures) that may be used in particular products."

The Greenpeace study reported that "regular use of perfumes could substantially contribute to individuals' daily exposure to these chemicals, some of which have already been recorded as contaminants in blood and breast milk."

The EPA's current stance on fragrances is that the issue is controversial; some consumers complain that fragrances irritate skin, complicate breathing and cause other discomfort while other consumers report pleasant experiences and attribute health benefits such as reducing stress to the fragrances (aromatherapy).

In spite of the controversy, the EPA continues to monitor research on the subject.

As most fragrances cover up existing odors, the best way to avoid toxic fragrances is to not use air fresheners or products with fragrances at all, but to eliminate the odor by cleaning or increasing air circulation.

Many natural and home-made cleaning products are easy to mix or are inexpensive.    

Baking soda absorbs acidic odors and vinegar defuses alkalinic odors. The Internet offers a profuse supply of recipes for home-made cleaning products.

Fresh fruit, flowers and herbs emit powerful aromas. Slice open an orange or place some freshly clipped mint or spearmint in a vase.

Use laundry detergents and fabric softeners without scents and avoid air fresheners altogether, including oil diffusers, plug-ins, sprays and gels.

Research perfumes, colognes and deodorants to find safe alternatives.

In a world plagued by cancer and consumed by artificial ingredients and man-made chemicals, why increase your exposure to harmful toxins by squirting more of these pollutants around your home?


 

We Are Downtown

By Matt Weafer
Greater Owensboro Business Magazine Messenger-Inquirer

As advocates of the future of downtown Owensboro, We Are Downtown is a group of business owners and downtown residents that meets monthly to discuss promoting downtown businesses and events, and to encourage the growth of the area.

Patty Acquisto, chair of We Are Downtown and owner of Patti’s Place, said, “What our organization is trying to do is promote the businesses that are here and encourage other businesses to consider downtown.”

When Acquisto opened Patti’s Place at 105 W. 2nd St., more than two years ago, she spent some time walking around downtown, meeting with other business owners and talking about how to improve business.

“I just started organizing and talking to other people,” she said. “The few of us got together and we grew from there.”

Members of We Are Downtown band together to promote various downtown events, such as the Holiday Stroll during the Christmas holiday season in 2008, which Acquisto said was a huge success.

“You would be amazed at the people who come into my shop here on Saturdays and say, ‘We just drove down from Bardstown, Jasper, E-town, or Henderson,’” she said. “That’s what people do. The first place they go is downtown. We try to have something for them when they get downtown. We make sure that they know about Memories on Main, The Crown, the restaurants and the coffee shop.”

“Downtown is the heart and soul of Owensboro and Daviess Co.,” she said.

Members of We Are Downtown are currently preparing for the eighth-annual Bluegrass Returns to its Roots on April 2, 3 and 4. Musicians will perform at the RiverPark Center, the Bluegrass Museum and other venues, including local retailers.

Some of the performers not scheduled to appear at any of the shows will be performing at different businesses such as the Famous Bistro and The Crème.

Acquisto said they are expecting at least 1,000 people for the weekend of music.

We Are Downtown meets the last Tuesday of every month in the Commerce Center at 5 p.m. Anyone interested in promoting downtown is welcome.

We Are Downtown Active Members:
Chair: Patti Acquisto
Chair-Elect: Charlie Schertzinger
Secretary: Renee Beasley Jones
Treasurer: George Skiadas
David Atkinson
Rodney Berry
Bob Bowers
Martha Clark
Larry Conder
Rosemary Conder
Sy Deane
Sue Fowler
Kim Johnson
Bruce Kunze
Carole Mac Quarrie
Karen Miller
Murry Morris
Ava Morris
Kathy Olson
Joel Osborne
Larry Peech
Fred Reeves
Gavin Roberts
Becky Stone
Russ Wilkey
Jim Zabek

Reprinted with permission from Messenger-Inquirer, Owensboro, Ky.

Downtown business owners support transformation

By Matt Weafer

Greater Owensboro Business Magazine Messenger-Inquirer

In a few short years, downtown will transform into Owensboro's hub of economic activity, tourism and entertainment. At least, that's the hope.

For now, city and county officials are busy organizing data and drawing plans while downtown business owners and Owensboro residents anxiously wait to see if this major investment pays off.

Confidence in the plan and the officials guiding the plan is the common denominator among downtown business owners while many city and country residents have voiced opposition against the emphasis placed on downtown and the tax hike implemented to fund the transformation.

"I am very optimistic about the Gateway plan and so proud of city and county governments in coming together and making this a reality," Rosemary Conder said. Conder and her husband Larry own The Crème Coffee House and The Crowne. The Conders also recently purchased the Smith-Warner Building on the southeast corner of St. Ann and W. 2nd Sts.

"I think the development for downtown will put Owensboro back on the map," Larry Peech, co-owner of Peachtree Antique Gallery, said. "It is awesome for the residents of the area and the future of this area.

It shows we are still pioneers and still developing."

"I think it's going to be good not only for businesses but for the city," George Skiadas, owner of the Famous Bistro, said.

While many businesses, residents and officials support the push for developing downtown, they — city and county officials, especially — have received harsh criticism.

"I am bewildered," Skiadas said, "that for the last couple of months there have been people that have spoken out in a very hateful and somewhat derogatory manner towards our city and county government because of the decision they made for the improvement of downtown."

Conder said, "I think (officials) did try to respect the wishes of the city. It makes me sad to see so much negativity."

Given the global economic slump that has made many individuals weary of tax increases of any kinds, Conder said, officials "agonized" over whether or not this was a good time to raise taxes.

"But I think we're at the sweet spot of our economy," she said. "I think we're in the sweet spot to buy the things we need. I think the tax hike is a really progressive step in making our city not stagnant. And that's where we were, really stagnant, no growth. I think we really needed this boost. I think the tax hike was really well thought out."

"No one likes more taxes," Skiadas said, "myself included. The county officials and city officials aren't delighted about paying more taxes. They're going to have to pay it, too. So it's not something that was easy to do."

Peech said, "For progress, we all have to bite a little bit of the expense. This is about improving the city and county. That we're going to be taxed is minor to what we're going to receive not only for us and our families but people coming into the city . . . and the next generation."

"If someone can come up to me and tell me how else to finance the project, then they should approach city and county government and tell them," Skiadas said, "and if it's a better idea, let's do it. Instead of just criticizing it, come up with a better idea. But a better idea is not to just do nothing. A lot of people say we don't have to do anything. That's not the answer. We will remain stagnant and in doing so we will regress."

But the vision is progress, transforming downtown Owensboro into the "jewel of the city," Skiadas said.

With such a major overhaul planned for downtown — transforming the river front, developing a market square and events center, and converting Veteran's Blvd. into a pedestrian priority street — construction sites will be a common scene downtown possibly for several years.

But Skiadas, Conder and Peech agree they don't expect that to affect business.

"I'm hoping that (construction) will bring out the curious people who want to see changes happening," Conder said. "And I think the city and county are working to make it as efficient as possible where when one area is closed, other areas will be open."

"(New construction) is a sign of prosperity," Peech said.

Part of that work will be the demolition of the Executive Inn.

Conder said she understands the need to tear down the former hotel, but hopes the city can reopen the convention center and Mitch McConnell Plaza.

"The Executive Inn was a wonderful concept and did its job for the time," Skiadas said. "That area will be more valuable to us as a city for residential development."

"I think if I could have a voice it would be to somehow try to help people be a little more positive about the changes and what the future's going to hold," Conder said. "Come and watch things change and have some hope. The citizens really can see that it's going to be such a good thing. Local economy is going to improve."

"If (city and county officials) act quickly on what they're doing," Peech said, "this progress will benefit us so greatly all of us will welcome it. Progress sometimes hurts but once it's done, people benefit from it and (they are) proud."

Reprinted with permission from the Messenger-Inquirer Owensboro, Ky.

Tuesday, April 7, 2009

Bishop McRaith’s life of ministry guided by Holy Spirit


By Matt Weafer

Western Kentucky Catholic

For Bishop John McRaith, retirement won't be much different than the past 26 years. He'll have fewer responsibilities, especially when the new bishop takes his seat as administrator of the 32-county diocese, but those responsibilities were just a part of God's calling.

Bishop McRaith's main job was to let the Holy Spirit work through him to spread the Good News, the love of Jesus Christ, which he will continue to do in retirement.

Even as the leader of the diocese, Bishop McRaith said he never felt like he was in control.

"When I think that I'm in charge," he said, "I'm in trouble. . . . We have to go back and remember that the Holy Spirit is in charge of the mission of the church."

And he defined that mission simply as spreading God's love.

"When I realize through my faith that I know God is in charge then I know I only have to do the best I can," he said. "And that doesn't mean I don't make mistakes. We all make mistakes."

For just more than a quarter of a century, Bishop McRaith dedicated his life to spreading the Good News in the Diocese of Owensboro, reaching out to the people that needed it most.

Sister Joseph Angela Boone, Director of Administration, said "He has started a lot of ministries in the diocese that had never been here before."

Some of the ministries the bishop helped found include the Family Life Office, the Social Concerns Office, the Religious Education Office, the Office of Wisdom, the Stewardship Office and the Safe Environment Office.

"He has also been a very strong advocate for Hispanic ministry," Sr. Joseph Angela said. "Another big thing that he has accomplished was getting just wages for the employees in the diocese, including staff and teachers."

But his most admirable trait, she said, was his patience with the people of the diocese, especially in administrative positions.

When he founded the Diocesan Pastoral Council, which currently has about 30 people from eight deaneries, Sr. Joseph Angela said, organizing the body into a coherent focus was difficult at its inception in the late 80s.

"His patience in trying to get that started was unbelievable," she said.

The Bishop's goal for this council was to bring forth concerns and suggestions from the grassroots level from parishes and deaneries.

"(But the members') reasons for being there was to carry out the mandates of the bishop," Sr. Joseph Angela said. "But he did not mandate things. He wanted solutions to come from the grassroots."

Sr. Joseph Angela recounted her first meeting with the Diocesan Pastoral Council: "It was prior to 1989 when I came. One member said, 'Bishop, just tell us what you want us to do and we'll do it.' That's not what he wanted. He wanted the people in the pews to come up with ideas. He wanted the body of the church to be aware of what needed to be done. He was very very collaborative."

Fr. John Vaughan said, "He's a great listener and believes in broad consultation. That's one of his trademarks that has served us well."

Bishop McRaith treated consultation not as a challenge but as a necessity to truly let the Holy Spirit work through the Diocese.

"We are a people with diverse abilities and diverse roles with a lot of questions," Bishop McRaith said. "And the Holy Spirit or God or Jesus expects us to live as one body. That will always be the challenge, not to let petty differences get in the way of serious work that needs to be done and to bring the Good News to all the people of God."

Catholic Schools Superintendant Jim Mattingly remembered Bishop McRaith saying in one of his homilies at CPC morning Mass, "We don't have to have all the answers. But if we have faith in God, the Spirit will lead us to the answers."    

While Bishop McRaith accomplished much during his time with the Diocese, he takes credit for very little.

"I just have immense gratitude for how the people have accepted me and how they have worked with me and how they have helped me grow in the model of God," he said. "There's a real sadness in leaving the ministry that I did have as the bishop, though I'll still be a bishop."

For the next year, Bishop McRaith will still help with confessions and the Chrism Mass or "whatever they want me to do," he said. "I'll wait to be asked."

With so many years invested into the dioceses, Bishop McRaith said picking out a favorite memory was too difficult. "There are so many things that have happened over those 26 plus years," he said, "some of it very very exciting and challenging, but generally we've had some great celebrations."

He said some of his favorite celebrations were when people traveled from across the diocese to celebrate as one. He also said one thing he wished he could have devoted more time to during his ministry was ecumenism.

"We've tried to put a great emphasis on the need for unity and oneness both in how we live out our lives whether bishop or priest or laity," he said, "but also it's an absolute essential to carry out the mission of the church. So there's been great effort put into building a sense of unity and culture of unity, if you will. How effective it's been only God can judge that."

The group of people that will directly feel the effects of the Bishop retiring the most is the staff that works with him every day.

"I'm going to miss working with the staff and working closely with the priests and the consultative bodies, and the laity I'll miss a lot," he said.

Sr. Joseph Angela said, "He has great devotion to the liturgy and is generous in celebrating the Eucharist with the staff here as often as he possibly can whenever he is available. That was one of his great contributions, I thought, that made him so great. He wanted to celebrate the Eucharist everyday. I appreciated it and a lot of other people did too."

For the future Bishop McRaith said he will say mass where he's invited or in his chapel. He also said that while he has lived at his house on 5th St. his entire career with the Diocese, the new bishop has the choice to live their. "If he would want the house," Bishop McRaith said, "he would have the right to have it. If he doesn't, I would probably remain here."

And while he has too many fond memories to single any out, he also had many trying times.

"The sexual abuse scandal was probably the most trying time because you're working with hurting people, trying to do the best you can to reach out to those who are hurting and help them in ways that we could," he said. "I certainly learned the pain of those who have experienced sexual abuse and those who have experienced any kind of abuse that affected their lives."

While the Owensboro Diocese was just one of many dioceses mixed in the scandal, the image of the entire Catholic Church suffered in the public eye. But the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops worked along with many others to redeem the sanctity of the Church.

"It depends on who you ask of course, but I think the bishops have done a great job of helping the diocese put together programs, safe environment programs which will hopefully not only be helpful to the church but as well as any entity that is dealing in particular with children," Bishop McRaith said. "I think that a tremendous amount of effort was put in on the part of many people to make the programs we have. The sexual abuse policies are probably some of the first since 1985. We've had a policy but it hadn't been updated."

But for the individuals directly affected by the scandal, there were more important things than the Church's image.

"(Bishop McRaith) was a perfect model of listening to people and not making them feel that it was all their fault," Sr. Joseph Angela said. "If you listen to someone sometimes that's all they need. Someone to listen to them and believe they are telling the facts as they really are."

She said the Bishop even offered to pay for counseling for anyone involved in the scandal.

"That's when we set up the safe environment office," Sr. Joseph Angela said. And all the employees and volunteers had to have a criminal background check."

"The many people I have talked to made me much more aware of the seriousness of the problem, the magnitude of it," Bishop McRaith said.

Former editor of the Messenger-Inquirer Dan Heckel said, "When the church was struggling to get through the abuse scandal, I was always impressed that the Bishop never avoided any of the reporters at the Messenger-Inquirer. Anytime a reporter called him, even though he knew it was going to be an unpleasant question, he always made himself available. That's rare these days, but Bishop McRaith has always stood a bit taller than the rest of the crowd."

Bishop McRaith's calm composure and gentleness permeated every aspect of his ministry.

"He was very very collaborative," Sr. Joseph Angela said. "He had extreme patience. He would listen to you and maybe if you were completely on the wrong track, he would very gently say 'but' and you would see the Holy Spirit coming out of him. He had a gentle way of educating you to the real thing and not what you thought it ought to be."

His dedication to the Holy Spirit was his constant guide and his compassion helped form his and the Diocese's argument against abortion, another difficult issue during the bishop's ministry.

"I think we need to see that Roe v. Wade was just one of the great injustices and the most serious injustice that was ever perpetrated on the people," Bishop McRaith said. "We're very much a church that believes in the dignity of the human person, the right of every human person to be treated with dignity the dignity that a child of God should have."

The bishop said that while there are many global issues the Catholic Church is hoping to impact, abortion is the first.

"Only in working on all of those issues will we make strides toward success," he said. "But the first issue is abortion because you have to be born before you can receive any injustices. This is the most defenseless group of people that deserve our best efforts to be their voices because they don't have one."

Perhaps surprisingly, the bishop's argument against abortion stems from stewardship.

"It really comes down to the question of who owns what, and God owns everything, which is the truth, and we are stewards of him," he said. "Once we get it through our heads that God owns everything, we'll begin to divide up resources and we'll play a major roll in shaping the future of the world and never to forget two things: how much God loves us, and from scripture, never to forget (that God said), 'You have not chosen me; I have chosen you.'"

As good stewards, good choices become obvious.

"It's very misunderstood when you talk about stewardship," he said. "People think you're talking about trying to give money, and that's the furthest from the truth. It's the question of where do we get our gifts from, and they came from God and they were given to us not for our own honor and glory but for the building up of the body of Christ, which means reaching out to everyone who's being treated unjustly and unfairly and who are not being able to use their gifts to the fullest."

For Bishop McRaith, the guidance of the Holy Spirit, the Good News of the Lord, and stewardship all role into one. "It's so simple people don't listen to it," he said. "To live out the answer is going to mean suffering and pain. It's going to mean a close loving relationship with Jesus and truly carrying out the great commandment to love each other as Jesus has loved us."

As for his hopes for the future bishop, Bishop McRaith said he hopes to see "someone who truly loves the wonderful faith-filled people that are here, and that includes the laity and priests, religious and the deacon. I just pray that he will find them as faith-filled as I have found them to be."

Sr. Joseph Angela said, "It will be hard for anyone to follow him. His generosity is great."

Tuesday, March 24, 2009

Lighter Living: Tap Water Saves the Environment and the Pocket Book

By Matt Weafer
VENT Magazine

Millions of Americans crack the tops to bottles of water at least once a day (if not more often) while they exercise, during a commute to work, a lunch break, a business meeting or at the movies as a healthy alternative to sugary sodas, sports drinks and tap water.

But there’s another element to the story — the environment.

Producing and packaging bottled water requires three to five times more water than will fit in the bottle, according to Calif.-based Pacific Institute.

And while recycling water bottles helps reduce the impact, only 12 percent of bottles were recycled in 2003, according to a 2007 MSNBC article. That number has likely risen in the past six years, but recycling plastic also requires a significant amount of energy and non-renewable resources.

According to a report on the Pacific Institute’s Web site, “More energy is needed to fill the bottles with water at the factory, move it by truck, train, ship, or air freight to the user, cool it in grocery stores or home refrigerators, and recover, recycle, or throw away the empty bottles. The Pacific Institute estimates that the total amount of energy embedded in our use of bottled water can be as high as the equivalent of filling a plastic bottle one quarter full with oil.”

Americans purchased 31.2 billion liters of bottled water in 2006. The Pacific Institute estimated that the energy required to produce those bottles equals approximately 17 million barrels of oil.

On top of the energy required to create, fill, package, ship and recycle the bottles, and the tons of non-recycled plastic bottles sitting in landfills, waiting 1,000 years before they start to decompose, the chemicals in the plastic bottles are potentially harmful to consumers as well.

Though the Food and Drug Administration regulates water before it enters bottles and once a year as it sits in the bottle, certain harmful contaminants such as phthalates or Bisphenol A can leach into the water as the bottles age, especially if the bottle is reused by the consumer.

Debating the health benefits of bottled water compared to tap water is difficult considering the number of water sources, state regulations, types of bottles and the amount of time a bottle of water sits on a shelf.

Bottled water is monitored by the Food and Drug Administration and tap water is monitored by the Environmental Protection Agency.

Both organizations apply stringent standards to water quality prior to marketing.

However, municipalities, such as Owensboro Municipal Utilities, monitor water quality daily, typically the same day a resident consumes the water.

And while bottled water companies use buzzwords like pure and natural, accompanied by images of free-flowing streams and picturesque mountains, many bottles of water are filled from the municipal water providers in the manufacturer’s city. The water is then, though not always, filtered.

Owensboro’s water source is an underground aquifer. The water filters naturally through the earth and is then pumped out, monitored and sent to homes in the city.

With some high-end bottled waters costing close to $10 per gallon, a mark-up of nearly 10,000 times, tap water is a more environmentally- and economically-friendly option.

According to OMU’s Water Quality Report for 2007, there was only one violation of water quality during the year. The presence of coliform bacteria, a natural contaminant, rose to 5.88 percent. The standard is no more than 5 percent. And once, noticed, the system was flushed, refilled and retested, showing no signs of the contaminant.

The International Bottled Water Association touts bottled water as “one of the safest and most regulated food products on Earth.”

This statement does not mean that bottled water is of better quality or safer than tap water. With the emergence of inexpensive home water purifiers hitting the market, tap water is a better environmental and economical option than bottled water. And with a sturdy thermos, it’s just as convenient.

Did you know?

The FDA reported that bottled water sitting in the sunlight does not leach chemicals linked to breast cancer into the water, unlike recent articles and viral emails have reported.

Lighter Living: Slouching economy hurts recycling opportunities

By Matt Weafer
VENT Magazine

The green movement permeates our society so thickly that the average consumer has bent their focus from buying the newest trendy item to curbing their carbon footprint.

Reduce, reuse, recycle has been the moniker of environmentalists for years. And regardless of the newest environmentally-friendly car or energy-saving appliance, recycling remains one the most beneficial activities for an eco-conscious lifestyle.

But Owensboro residents are limited.

The recycling center now located at the Public Works Building on W. 5th St. only accepts newspaper, cardboard, aluminum cans, steel cans, clear plastic and opaque, colorless plastic.

What about the other five types of plastic? Or glass? Or even computer products, fluorescent lights and hazardous wastes?

Unfortunately, Downy Ward, manager of the Owensboro Sanitation Department, said, currently, there is not a market in the area for glass and other recyclables. And hauling the material would not only put out a significant amount of particulate matter from the trucks but would also be fiscally irresponsible as the city’s trucks cost $4 to $5 per mile.

The recycling industry as a whole has taken a hit along with the rest of the economy.

“Everybody wants to do the right thing,” Ward said. “People’s hearts are in the right place . . . (but) the bottom has dropped out of the market.”

Owensboro sells its recyclables to local recycling distributor Resource Recycling.

“They dictate the amounts and quantities of what we recycle based on the industry that will accept it,” Ward said.

Glass and the other types of plastic are “tremendously hard to recycle,” Ward said. And there are no industries nearby to which Owensboro can sell its post-consumer product; therefore Resource Recycling does not accept those items.

And the industry is struggling so much that Resource Recycling has suspended payment on newspaper and cardboard, so the Sanitation Department collects those at a loss.

The largest buyer of recyclable paper product is China, Ward said. And along with the rest of the global economy, China’s production of recycled paper products has either slowed or stopped, which means Resource Recycling cannot sell the recyclable newspaper and cardboard.

In the meantime, Resource Recycling is stock-piling paper waste until it can find a buyer, Ward said.

“We’ve tried to talk to local paper companies like Scott Paper Co. about purchasing recycled paper,” Ward said. But the city can’t produce enough product at the purity level the companies request in order to create a viable relationship.

With the economic slump, businesses and industries trim excess costs and in many cases, industries can purchase virgin resources significantly cheaper than recycled.

Regardless of the troubled market, the Sanitation Department is still accepting the same six items, including agricultural waste such as leaves and grass clippings at the Sports Center.

Home Depot offers recycling drop-off for compact fluorescent light bulbs (CFLs). GreenWorks Recycling, located at 101 E. 9th St. recycles e-scrap such as old computers, cell phones, game consoles and other technological hardware.

Ward said that he’s waiting to hear from the Western Kentucky Correctional Complex about purchasing recycled, glass cullet to use in refilling culverts and other applications. The Sanitation Department would then begin accepting glass.

For the other recyclable products, the solution, Ward said, is to increase demand for recycled material.

“If people say, I want to do what’s right and pay that extra cost, then there’s a market and a factory that can sustain itself,” Ward said.

While the motto is reduce, reuse, recycle, there’s another unspoken step, buy recycled products to maintain the demand.

As the recycling industry continues to grow, more options will become available to Owensboro, but in the meantime, Ward said, “The best thing you can do is try to reduce the amount of virgin product you consume,” and when you can, buy recycled products.